In the U.S. in 2025, there were 2,011,044 weddings, costing an average of $33,000. But long before the expense and planning that the event involves, couples get engaged, which means the financial pressure first starts long before the Big Day.
Although operating at a level far from either Kim Kardashian’s $8 million 15-carat diamond or even Nicola Peltz Beckham’s $1.85 million 10-carat diamond, modern engagement rings and engagement ceremonies increasingly involve significant outlay.
Beyond the cost of the ring, plenty of money is routinely spent on a professional photographer, proposal trips, engagement parties, and celebratory events shared across social media. On average, a contemporary U.S. engagement costs around $9,150.
In this study, we’ll consider which U.S. states spend the most on engagement as a proportion of their available income. We’ll also look at how modern marriage has evolved and why it’s changed, and we’ll consider the shifting role of engagement and the influential role of social media.
Before we get on to those topics, let’s look at how much engagement costs today in the United States.
Engagement Expenses In The United States
The figures in the above table illustrate the modern-day cost of engagement, which has become a substantial financial commitment, long before wedding costs loom.
According to industry estimates, couples now spend approximately $9,150 on engagement-related expenses. This expenditure starts with the engagement ring, which, on average, costs around $5,200, the single largest engagement cost.
Yet there are other costs to consider, with many contemporary couples investing heavily in the proposal itself. Curated proposal experiences are now popular, and can include special venues, travel, bespoke decor, and professional planning, all of which can amount to $2,500 or more, depending on the location and scope of the ceremony.
Professional photography is another common feature of modern engagements. Proposal or engagement photography typically costs around $950, while standard engagement photo sessions usually run to around $500.
Combined, these expenses reflect the extent to which engagements have evolved: from simple, special moments to carefully planned, experience-driven milestones.
The growing emphasis on widely-shared, carefully choreographed event coverage and destination proposals has significantly increased the cost of getting engaged. In fact, engagements are now often a multi-faceted investment, increasingly equivalent to a ‘mini-wedding.’
And if we look at the highest single cost of an engagement (the ring), while its initial value is priceless, its enduring financial value is another matter.
The Value of an Engagement Ring
Some purchases, such as antiques and properties, are investments. While engagement rings occupy a unique position (as symbolic representations of love and as luxury items), they don’t generally retain significant financial value for the average buyer.
According to resale marketplace data, secondary engagement rings are usually subject to much lower values than their original purchase price. Many sellers report offers at 30%–60% of initial ring prices when listing through resale platforms.
This steep reduction reflects typical market dynamics, with wholesale or resale values usually based on wholesale diamond pricing, as opposed to retail value.
Academic and industry analyses offer further confirmation that jewelry is rarely a strong financial investment, with an inflated ‘jewelry premium’ contributing to higher upfront consumer costs that do not translate to resale value.
Even when factoring in precious metals like platinum or gold, a ring’s material value is often overshadowed by other financially transient factors, such as design, brand, and craftsmanship margins.
An additional factor has led to rising engagement costs: social media and viral culture.
How Viral Culture Made Engagement More Expensive
In today’s social-media-driven culture, a quiet, private engagement is increasingly rare. Nowadays, engagements are frequently carefully orchestrated, shareable events, a shift that has helped to drive proposal costs to record highs.
While the engagement ring remains the ceremonial centerpiece, the aforementioned $9,150 average engagement costs feature add-ons driven by social media. With the engagement ring accounting for around $5,200 of that overall average, the remaining amount of almost $4,000 is due to additional proposal-related costs largely tied to presentational elements.
These can include curated proposal experiences involving exotic engagement venues (often overseas), venue rentals, décor, signage, flowers, and professional planning services, all of which can easily exceed $2,500 in costs.
Professional photography or videography ($950 to $1,500) is also increasingly common for those wanting to create the best possible social-media-ready ceremony, while other costs, such as sales tax, ring insurance, resizing, and post-proposal celebrations, further inflate the final price.
Such rising expectations mean that for many couples, the financial burden of engagement can rival other major life expenses and can put early pressure on individuals to invest thousands of dollars. This often happens before joint finances, shared savings, or wedding budgets have even begun to be considered.
As a result, viral engagement culture has transformed what was once a simple, special occasion into an often complex, highly expensive event, with engagement costs now playing an increasingly prominent role in shaping how, when, and whether couples take the next step.
And engagement costs represent a far more significant proportion of a couple’s income in some U.S. states compared to others.
Annual Salaries Versus Engagement Expenses
As our study data has established, engagement costs across the United States have risen. And that means more of a couple’s combined financial capabilities are committed to the ceremony. Yet the proportion of a couple’s income needed to cover engagement costs depends largely on the state in which they reside.
If we look at the ten states that feature the lowest median nonfamily household income, average engagement costs ($9,150) represent a substantial share of annual earnings, ranging from between 20% and 27% of yearly income.
(Of course, not everyone can afford to do this, particularly during a cost-of-living crisis; the number represents the median average, with a large number of couples necessarily spending far less.)
Mississippi couples are especially strained, with the cost of engagement costing over one-quarter of a year’s income.
Arkansan and West Virginian couples spend a quarter of their combined annual income on engagement expenses, meaning the ceremony rivals major life expenditure commitments such as rent and student loan payments.
Even for couples who live in states at the lower end of the top ten (such as Tennessee and South Carolina), engagement costs still account for a fifth of their annual income.
These figures suggest that for millions of Americans, engagements represent a significant, daunting financial commitment that may require patient saving or financial help. The figures also emphasize that state income disparities can significantly influence engagement decisions across the country.
And as other economic pressures (rising housing costs, inflation, and stagnant wage growth) continue to stake their claim on household budgets, many couples increasingly seek value-driven alternatives, transparent pricing, and flexible options.
These can allow couples on a journey towards an eventual wedding celebrate their commitment without adding pre-marriage financial strain.
And yet, for some couples, the modern-day pressures around engagement kudos and cachet outweigh financial comfort.
Engagement Debt and Financial Pressure
For many couples, the costs of getting engaged are simply necessary evils, with nothing likely to stand in their way of a lavish engagement, whatever the financial permutations.
As a result, many newly engaged couples turn to credit cards, personal loans, or family assistance to cover engagement costs. Survey data tells us that nearly 30% of couples take on debt related to wedding expenses. Yet in many cases, we can now add engagement costs to the marriage-related financial burden.
The pressure to meet social and cultural norms, particularly those amplified by social media, can mean that couples feel obliged to spend more than planned, and more than they can realistically afford.
Subsequently, engagement-related debt is a growing concern, with a proposal no longer a mere emotional milestone but also a financial one that can badly compromise a couple’s general economic outlook.
For a broader perspective on national income disparities, here’s a closer look at median income, state by state.
Median U.S. Income by State
The U.S. map of median nonfamily household income highlights pronounced regional disparities and reveals where individuals are best and worst placed to cope with the financial demands of engagement.
The highest median incomes are concentrated in the Northeast, West Coast, and parts of the Mid-Atlantic, with Washington, D.C. ($71,246) ranking highest overall, followed by Massachusetts ($67,739), New Jersey ($63,729), Maryland ($63,322), and California ($63,280).
These higher-income regions generally reflect strong labor markets, higher concentrations of professional industries, and high living costs.
In contrast, the Southeast and parts of Appalachia feature the lowest median nonfamily household incomes. Mississippi ($34,056) ranks lowest, followed by Arkansas ($36,074), West Virginia ($36,546), and Alabama ($37,952).
Across much of the South, median incomes remain below $45,000, sorely limiting the financial flexibility of individuals independently navigating major life milestones.
Meanwhile, much of the Midwest and Mountain West falls into a middle-income range, with median nonfamily household earnings between $47,000 and $52,000, reflecting moderate earning power still subject to budget constraints.
Overall, the map illustrates the fact that income levels for nonfamily households vary widely across the country, determining how financially prepared individuals are when considering engagement and marriage.
Such disparities help to explain why engagement-related expenses represent a significantly heavier financial burden for those residing in lower-income states.
And this factor also means engagement is a different matter in different parts of the U.S., with budget options and value-conscious decision-making much more important in some states than others.
Adaptation is key, and that extends beyond available income.
How Adaptation is Increasingly Key to Couples Getting Engaged
As engagement costs have risen, couples have increasingly adapted their approach. In fact, recent surveys show that 70% of women are now willing to contribute to engagement ring costs. (19% of women are happy to pay the full fee.)
Another growing trend is ‘quiet proposing,’ with more than half of modern couples choosing engagement rings together instead of relying on a surprise purchase, reflecting a move toward shared planning and risk-free cost-sharing.
At the same time, nearly 48% of couples say they struggle to align the gap between social-media-inspired expectations and financial capabilities, with many moving away from lavish gestures in favor of budget-friendly choices.
While proposal photography remains popular (study data confirms a recent 71% increase in searches for engagement photographers), many couples forego this part of the equation to apportion more of their available spend on a ring or a location.
Collectively, trends tell us that some couples are already scaling down their engagement and proposal plans to prioritize meaningful connection and financial collaboration over aesthetic or high-cost imperatives.
The contemporary evolution of engagement also means that marriage ceremonies are now subject to a knock-on effect.
How Engagement Costs Are Reshaping Traditions
As engagement expenses rise, many couples carry their adjustment into their wedding plans, and ultimately opt for smaller or nontraditional ceremonies like ‘micro weddings’.
In fact, 48% to 57% of surveyed couples have shown interest in a ‘micro-wedding,’ which is defined as a ceremony with 50 or fewer guests (such weddings accounted for 18% of all weddings in the U.S. in 2024).
Google search data from December 2023 to November 2025 shows sustained consumer interest across all stages of commitment, from proposals to alternative wedding formats, including simpler, more cost-conscious marriage journeys.
Searches for ‘elopement’ were high (110,000 searches per month), with recurring spikes pushing the numbers up to 135,000. This shows that elopement is now a popular (as opposed to marginal) option for couples navigating rising engagement and wedding costs.
Interest in ‘engagement’ and ‘proposal’ was also steady (both terms averaging roughly 49,500 monthly searches, with periodic increases to 60,500). But while searches for ‘microwedding’ (10,000 searches per month) and ‘small wedding’ (2,400) remain low in number, their presence is persistently significant and growing.
Overall, it’s clear that scaled-down celebrations are no temporary response to economic conditions, but part of a longer-term shift in how couples approach marriage. And this extends across the United States and beyond.
Engagements Across Cultures
Engagement and wedding spending vary dramatically, due not only to income and geography but also to various cultural norms and expectations. Within the United States, state-level data from bridal industry experts reveals wide disparities.
For example, the average spend on an engagement ring in Massachusetts frequently exceeds $10,800, whereas in West Virginia, the average drops to under $650. This expenditure gap doesn’t just reflect economic variation: it’s also down to local social customs and regional bridal culture.
These contrasts align with historical patterns regarding cultural attitudes toward marriage, family contribution norms, and communal celebration expectations. All factors significantly shape how couples prioritize different components of the engagement and wedding journey.
Internationally, similar patterns appear when comparing countries and cultural traditions. A 2024 survey on global marriage customs showed that in countries like India and Egypt, families often cover significant portions of engagement and bridal jewelry costs, with extensive ceremonial spending often deeply embedded in cultural practice.
In parts of South Asia, for instance, gold jewelry isn’t just a personal adornment. It also functions as a family heirloom and financial safety net, which can drastically increase otherwise nominal engagement costs.
Conversely, in several Scandinavian and Northern European cultures, engagement rings are often modest or even withheld until much later, with emphasis instead placed on other rituals or on the wedding itself.
Millennial and Gen Z couples across cultures also display evolving priorities. Global wedding trend reports suggest that younger generations are more likely to opt for simple, unostentatious rings, underplay materialism, and focus spending on joint experiences (such as travel and shared celebrations).
This generational evolution intersects with economic factors, such as rising student debt and housing costs. And ultimately, it’s slowly reshaping what engagement looks like across cultural and national lines, with respect for heritage less important than financial pragmatism and less material focus.
This follows a gradual shift in marriage trends across U.S. generations since the 1940s.
Marriage Trends During Recent U.S. History
The number of married households throughout the country has decreased by 28% since 1940. In 1940, marriage defined the American household, with roughly three-quarters of all households led by married couples.
Over the following decades, that share steadily declined to below 60% by the early 1980s, 50% by the late 2000s. In 2024, the percentage of U.S. households led by married couples was 47.1%.
The data reflects a broad structural shift toward later marriage, increased cohabitation, higher divorce rates, and more single-person or nontraditional households.
As of 2024, the average age for people getting married for the first time is 30.2 for men and 28.6 for women. According to the U.S. Census, the youngest recorded median ages occurred in 1956, when men typically married at 22.5 and women at 20.1.
Since then, the cost of major life milestones tied to marriage (including engagements, weddings, housing, and child-rearing) has risen substantially, prompting many couples to postpone marriage until they feel more financially secure.
This long-term decline helps to explain why engagements today are often more deliberate, milestone-driven, and financially significant, occurring in a context where fewer households are married, and both engagement and marriage mean very different things.
Failed Engagement And ‘Conditional Gift’
While there’s no definitive nationwide statistic on failed engagements, estimates suggest that 1 in 5 engagements ends in a breakup before marriage. In many jurisdictions, the ring is treated as a conditional gift that must be returned if the marriage doesn’t go ahead.
This legal stipulation means that the emotional and financial stakes of breaking off a proposal extend beyond disappointment. The ring, which often costs thousands of dollars, may need to be surrendered under state law if the wedding is canceled.
The Evolution of Engagement
In 2025, there were more than
2 million weddings in the United States, costing on average $33,000. But before couples get this far, the financial permutations of committing to marriage increasingly start with engagement.
In many cases, engagements are now major financial milestones, with couples spending around $9,150 on engagement-related expenses (with the ring alone costing on average $5,200).
Costs include travel, venue rentals, décor, professional photography, planning services, insurance, and post-proposal celebrations.
Elopement is now a popular (as opposed to marginal) option for couples navigating rising engagement and wedding costs
And viral engagement culture is at the heart of this evolution, with proposals increasingly becoming multi-faceted, highly expensive shareable events.
Such rising engagement costs put uneven pressure on U.S. couples. In lower-income states, the price of getting engaged can absorb up to 27% of annual income, forcing difficult trade-offs between engagement spending and financial stability.
Compounding that factor is the fact that engagement rings rarely represent an investment, with resale data confirming that rings typically return only 30%–60% of their original retail value, meaning a lot of upfront spending is unrecoverable.
A further economically draining issue is the reliance on credit cards, personal loans, or family financial assistance to cover engagement costs. Ultimately, nearly 30% of couples end up saddled with some form of wedding-related debt.
So it’s no surprise that couples are actively recultivating engagement and wedding traditions. Shared ring purchases, ‘quiet proposals,’ skipping some more traditional proposal expenses, and opting for smaller or nontraditional ceremonies have become increasingly common as couples prioritize affordability and long-term financial health.
And such moves follow a long continuum of evolving national marriage trends, including later marriage ages, fewer married households, and more intentional approaches to commitment.
Overall, the data suggests that for some, modern engagements mean accepting debt to fulfil specific, social-media-driven goals. For others, they’re a chance to create a unique, highly personal commitment to a lifetime partnership.
ions and permutations, reflecting how economic realities continue to redefine the first steps toward modern U.S. marriage.
At Mark Broumand, we believe that luxury should be accessible. We offer wholesale pricing on all of our jewelry, making it possible for our clients to acquire high-end pieces at an attainable price point.
With our commitment to quality, customization, and personalized service, we're confident that our clients will be delighted with their experience and the timeless pieces they take home.